I changed my major from accounting and finance, and headed out, with the vision that I was going to have a meaningful career helping people heal emotionally and relationally through spiritual growth. And for three years, I had poured myself into studying everything I could find, and had gone to work in a Christian psychiatric hospital to learn the state of the art. And after three years, I had come to a conclusion: this was not something I wanted to give my life to anymore.
The reason was that the “Christian” models that were out there at the time left me feeling like Really? Is that all there is? for more reasons than one. First, they did not make sense to me biblically. But second, and much more importantly, I did not see them bringing about the kinds of transformation that the Bible talked about when it spoke of the healing power of the gospel. So, if that was what Christian Psychology was about, I was going to do something else.
01. Four Models
For the most part, these models of healing fell into four categories. First was the “sin” model. It said that if you are suffering in some way, it is because there must be sin in your life and you should be confronted about your sin, confess it and repent, and then you would be well. Great! I thought—at first. I believed in sin and that sin was a problem.
But then I hit a wall in working with people: many of them were suffering not because of their sin, but because of terrible things that had happened to them. Abuse, neglect, abandonment. What were they supposed to repent of? They hadn’t done anything wrong to cause their suffering. I could quickly see that this model could not speak to those that Jesus spoke of as the oppressed or downtrodden. While I knew that although sin was a problem, I was also realizing that this could not be the whole answer. Next came the “truth” model. It said that if you memorized enough Scripture, and really got the truth in your head, or learned your “position in Christ” through knowing the truth of who you were “in Him,” then your emotional and psychological problems would go away. “The truth will set you free,” or “as a man thinking in his heart, so is he,” were the pillars of this perspective on healing.
The problem with this model was that I was seeing many people who knew those truths, had memorized them, recited them all the time, and yet were still suffering. Besides, I knew enough theology, anthropology and philosophy to know that the Bible said we are creatures made up of “heart, mind, soul and strength,” and not just “the thinking mind.” As important as truth is, there had to be more to the story, and I was seeing that lack play out before me. Besides, as I would realize later, “just know the truth and the truth will set you free” is not what the Bible teaches anyway. That is not even what the passage says, which was usually only partially quoted by those using the truth model. What it actually says is, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth and the truth will set you free.” In other words, we get set free by truth as we walk in it and live it out, “hold to” it, not just memorize it. More about that later, but I knew that just knowing truth did not equal healing, both personally as well as with those I worked with.
Third was the deliverance model. This perspective on healing said that if you were suffering you needed deliverance from some kind of demon or curse, and you could either get that from a supernatural deliverance or a fighting the demons off with Scripture. I remember once when a man told me he had the demon of “financial poverty,” and as we talked more, I ended up telling him that there was no demon of “irresponsibility” and he needed to get off of the couch and get a job. While I have seen that demons exist and do cause great suffering, I knew also that there were other reasons causing the suffering that I saw, and I sat with people after multiple deliverances who were still hurting and needed help. This, too, was a limited model.
And finally, there were the various forms of the “inner healing” model. In these forms of healing, sometimes called experiencing “God’s touch,” people would get in touch with a painful memory, or have a cathartic release of pain. The healer would pray for them or go through a guided experience and “take Jesus to the moment of pain,” or a similar technique. Again, there was some relief that would happen, but not the transformation that I was looking for and which I saw described in the Bible.
02. Desert Time
So, I told God I wanted to do something else. And he basically said, “Shut up and keep going.” So, I did, and it was like entering into the desert. I felt as if I was throwing my education and life away, and pursuing something that I neither liked nor even believed in anymore. But, I had to keep going—I thought that was what God had led me to do. To make a long story short, over the next few years,
I began to see what I had gone into the field to see. I saw depressed people not just cope but turn into people who no longer got depressed. I saw people with eating disorders turn into people who had a normal relationship with food. And it went on and on. Healing really did occur. I was seeing it first hand, and was experiencing it in my own life as well. God was leading me in this journey, step by step.
Now, it would seem that this would have been a happy time, right? I had been in despair because I was not seeing enough change happen, and now I was seeing healing take place. Victory, you would think.
But the exact opposite was taking place. I was entering into a greater despair than before. The reason: None of the processes I was learning, processes that were bringing about real healing, were what I had been taught as “Christian.” They were effective, but as far as I knew, not “spiritual” in the ways that I had learned about spiritual growth. So, the essence of my despair was being forced into a choice I did not like. I could help people and not feel like I was engaging in spiritual redemption, or I could be “spiritual” and not very helpful. I did not like either one of those. I was stuck.
I turned to God again, and asked Him to help me out of this quandary. Then, I decided to basically drop out of life (other than work) for a couple of years, and just start over. I went back to the Bible and tried to approach it without those models in my head and just read it as it was. I wanted to see it from as blank a slate as possible. I emptied my preconceptions and just read Scripture as Scripture.
I can only express what happened over that time period in one way: I was born again, again. Everything that I had been observing that was bringing about healing was right there in the Bible all along. It was all there. For the first time in a long time, I felt like I could be in my skin, embracing reality, the Bible, and God all at the same time.
I also discovered something else. Those other models were not in the Bible after all. Nowhere did it say that if you are “good” (without sin) you will not suffer, or that suffering only comes from one’s own sin. Similarly, it did not say that knowing truth, deliverance, or guided prayer would be cure-alls either. I felt released from having to believe exclusively in one model or another, in having to believe things that I knew not to be reality, and I had a renewed faith that the Bible was truer than I had ever known.
03. Salvation as Healing
What I was seeing was that “salvation” was something more than I had ever thought. It was not just about getting saved from hell, or just having a relationship with God. While those were certainly true, the Bible was saying something else as well. The word “salvation” actually means “healing.”Wherever the Greek word sozo appears in Scripture, it can alternately be translated as “saved” or “healed.”Redemption meant that God was bringing us back to the way we were supposed to be, and “reconciling all things unto himself.” Salvation was in