Conversatio Divina

Part 11 of 16

Henri Nouwen as Evangelical Mystic

Wil Hernandez
Share  — Twitter Facebook Link

Table of Contents

  1. 01.  Nouwen, the Gospel Preacher
  2. 02.  Mystical and Evangelical
  3. 03.  Nouwen’s Mysticism

I suspect the title of this essay may raise eyebrows. Labeling Henri Nouwen, one of the most influential spiritual writers of the past century, a mystic is not likely to fuel any argument. But to call such a well-known Catholic an evangelical may be an altogether different story.

The terms evangelical and mystic do not seem to fit naturally together. Mysticism is still very much an alien concept to the average Protestant, let alone evangelical. To make sense of the pairing of these concepts requires us to open each of them up if they are to fit someone of Henri Nouwen’s stature. He is too large a figure to be forced into our small categorical boxes.

Evangelicalism is far from monolithic and cannot be defined in an exclusive manner. Historically, the term first appeared as a label for a group of sixteenth-century Catholics who were determined to recover a more biblical form of Christianity. Luther, Calvin, and other European reformers of the day adopted the same label. In more modern times, evangelicals have generally come to be known as serious believers who stick to the biblical fundamentals of their faith. The term has, of course, evolved since then, as new evangelicals, post-evangelicals, progressive evangelicals, ecumenical evangelicals, charismatic evangelicals, and, yes, Catholic evangelicals all find their home within this movement. The common thread woven through all of them is their shared commitment to the evangel or good news. This is the core of being an evangelical: a foundational focus on the gospel of Christ and a strong emphasis on evangelism and conversion.

This is why I feel free to identify Henri Nouwen as an evangelical. Theologically he was neither liberal nor conservative. And he cannot be considered evangelical in the institutional sense of the word. Yet I hasten to suggest that Nouwen was every bit an evangelical when it came to his Christ-centered spiritual calling. The gospel was no doubt uppermost in his conviction and ministry.

01.  Nouwen, the Gospel Preacher

Nobody can read Nouwen’s books such as Letters to Marc about Jesus and Making All Things New and not be impressed by how crystal clear his understanding of the gospel message and the nature of our life in the Spirit was. He wrote, “It has become clearer to me than ever that my personal relationship with Jesus is the heart of my existence.” Henri J. M. Nouwen, Letters to Marc About Jesus (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1988), 7.He recognized his vocation as that of preaching Christ’s gospel to all who would listen. “To speak about Jesus and his divine work of salvation,” Nouwen insisted, “shouldn’t be a burden or a heavy obligation.” Genuinely, he believed that “what we have received is so . . . rich that we cannot hold it to ourselves but feel compelled to bring it to every human being we meet.”Henri J. M. Nouwen, Bread for the Journey (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1997), 5.

Michael O’Laughlin suggested that Nouwen “brought evangelical excitement to Catholics and . . . depth of Catholic sacramentality . . . to his Protestant listeners.” As Nouwen’s former teaching assistant at Harvard, O’Laughlin recalled how Nouwen struck him as one of those “evangelical preachers who know how to . . . get people excited about following Jesus . . . like something straight out of the revival tent.”Gerald S. Twomey and Claude Pomerlau, eds. Remembering Henri (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2006), 6–5. Nouwen did proclaim Jesus boldly and rather unashamedly at Harvard—something deemed by many insiders of the university as a politically incorrect move. When Nouwen later sensed constraints on being able to continue to do this, he chose not to compromise what he believed to be his primary calling. Instead, he left the Ivy League school without any regrets. How can you get more evangelically minded than that?

But there’s more to Nouwen than his evangelical fervor; there’s definitely a mystical side to him that is palpable in both his life and his writings.

02.  Mystical and Evangelical

Mysticism, like evangelicalism, is not easy to define. Volumes have been written on the subject, but the “myst” in mysticism often clouds our perception and makes it hard to understand how this is something for all Christians, not just the spiritual elite.

Nouwen’s understanding of mysticism cuts through this confusion. He described a mystic as a person whose identity is deeply rooted in God’s love. In its essence, mysticism is simply dwelling in the presence of God, this being the heart of contemplative prayer.Henri J. M. Nouwen, In the Name of Jesus (New York: Crossroad, 1989), 28. Every Christian, he felt, was essentially a mystic whose mystical life needed to be continually deepened and nurtured by the spiritual disciplines.

While Nouwen was much at home in the company of evangelicals and shared their directness and openness about their faith in Jesus, he also wrote that “evangelicals have a great need for a mystical dimension to their lives so they could be more free in living and not driven.” He went on to argue that the

evangelical movement has become just a bit victimized by a success-oriented culture, wanting the church—like the corporation—to be successful. On that level, the mystical tradition of communion with Christ is important. “I am the vine, you are the branches. If you remain connected with me, then you will bear fruit.” The fruit is not success.Arthur Boers, “What Henri Nouwen Found at Daybreak: Experiments in Spiritual Living in a Secular World,” Christianity Today 38, October 3, 1994, 29.

Nouwen’s comments on the evangelical movement are very reminiscent of another early twentieth-century evangelical mystic, A. W. Tozer. Tozer, who introduced Christian mysticism into the mainstream of Protestant evangelicalism, at one time expressed his distress over “the way in which conservative Christianity was being applied—or not applied—in the practical walk of the Christian believer with his Lord.” Tozer identified this subtle error as a practical one, not a theological one: “It was the lack of mysticism in evangelical Christianity.”David A. J. Seargent, Lamps on the Candelabrum: Five Evangelical Mystics (2003), eBook, 17.

Tozer’s understanding of mysticism aligns well with Nouwen’s. To Tozer, a mystic is one who “experiences his faith down in the depths of his . . . being.” He went on to describe the mystic as one who “exists in a world of spiritual reality” and is “quietly, deeply, and sometimes almost ecstatically aware of the Presence of God in his own nature and the world around him.” A. W. Tozer, The Christian Book of Mystical Verse (Camp Hill, PA: WingSpread Publishers, 1991), vi. Both Tozer and Nouwen understood mysticism as a direct, personal experience of God. Both embodied the evangelical and mystical dimensions of the Christian faith.

03.  Nouwen’s Mysticism

Nouwen’s writings reveal two mystical encounters. The first occurred very early after his ordination as a priest—in fact, at his first Mass of Thanksgiving during his Post-Communion meditation. We don’t know exactly what transpired except that Nouwen described the moment as “an intimate and mystical experience.”Henri J. M. Nouwen, Can You Drink This Cup? (Notre Dame, IN: Ave Maria Press, 1996), 110. It seems fitting that this first mystical experience coincided with the celebration of the Holy Communion. By his own testimony, his life gravitated around the mystery of the Eucharist—the sacred ritual that he deemed to be the spiritual core of his priesthood.

The second took place while he was about to undergo surgery in 1989 after a near brush with death. Seriously injured when a van’s side mirror hit him as he walked along the icy road near the L’Arche Daybreak Community in Canada, Nouwen described the following transcendent encounter just prior to his surgery:

What I experienced then was something I had never experienced before: pure and unconditional love. Better still, what I experienced was an intensely personal presence, a presence that pushed all my fears aside and said, “Come, don’t be afraid. I love you.”Henri J. M. Nouwen, Beyond the Mirror (New York: Crossroad, 1990), 46–47.

Nouwen did not view either of these experiences as simply private. His interior experiences consistently found exterior expression. The first, set within the context of the Eucharistic celebration, impacted the way Nouwen effectively utilized the Holy Communion as a means to reach out to others inclusively and communally. As a priest, Nouwen always acted as a gracious and accommodating spiritual host, openly displaying a spirit of inclusivity. Mary Bastedo, chair of the Spiritual Life Committee at the time Nouwen joined the L’Arche community, made this comment about him: “He lived his priesthood not as something that excluded others but rather as a way to invite others into participation.”Mary Bastedo, as quoted in Befriending Life, Beth Porter, et al., ed. (New York: Doubleday, 2001), 33.

His second experience of the reality of God’s love emboldened him to proclaim his identity as God’s beloved with renewed conviction. Once he grasped deeply the essence of his belovedness, Nouwen felt free to give of himself in love to others. Propelled by such a life-transforming perspective, Nouwen solidified his newfound certainty with this confession: “I am convinced that I will truly be able to love the world when I fully believe that I am loved far beyond its boundaries.”Nouwen, Beyond the Mirror, 70.

Henri Nouwen’s mysticism projected a healthy balance between the inward and the outward realities of his lived experience. Far from the stereotyped notion of a solitary mystic who is thoroughly detached from the world, Nouwen exemplified a mysticism of communal engagement. This is much in keeping with the type of mysticism that Evelyn Underhill advocated: a union with the divine that “impels a person towards an active, outside, rather than purely passive, inward life.”As cited in Philip Sheldrake, Spaces for the Sacred (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 2001), 128. Nouwen himself concluded, after reading Evelyn Underhill’s The Mystics of the Church, that it “is one of the most convincing arguments for the Christian belief that the love of God lived in its fullest sense leads to a most selfless dedication to the neighbor.” Henri J. M. Nouwen, The Genesee Diary (New York: Image Books, 1989), 177. Clearly, Henri Nouwen’s mysticism is based upon the intertwining thrusts of the Great Commandment—to love God and to love our neighbor—that, for him, can never be divorced from each other.

In an equally profound way, Henri Nouwen came to believe that mysticism “is the opposite of withdrawal from the world.” He went on to argue that our “intimate union with God leads to the most creative involvement in the contemporary world.” Nouwen, The Genesee Diary, 177. “The great mystical truth of the spiritual life,” Nouwen emphasized, “is that the more intimately connected you are with the Lord, the more in solidarity you are with all the suffering people of the world.” Henri J. M. Nouwen, “Intimacy, Fecundity, and Ecstasy,” Radix (May/June, 1984), 10. He repeatedly insisted that “we cannot live in intimate communion with Jesus without being sent to our brothers and sisters who belong to that same humanity that Jesus has accepted as his own.” Henri J. M. Nouwen, Lifesigns (New York: Doubleday, 1986), 45. This shows his firm belief about the inevitable interconnection between intimacy and solidarity. Fueled by this conviction, Nouwen wrestled with the spiritual and social ramifications of the gospel. Such was his way of working out his own brand of evangelical mysticism.

In Jesus, Nouwen argued, “the mystical and the revolutionary ways are not opposite ways, but two sides of the same human mode of experiential transcendence.” Henri J.M. Nouwen, The Wounded Healer (New York: Image Books, 1979), 19. “Jesus,” Nouwen added, “was a revolutionary who did not become an extremist, since he did not offer an ideology but himself. He was also a mystic who did not use his intimate relationship with God to stay away from the social evils of his time.” Mysticism and revolution can, therefore, be seen as “two aspects of the same attempt to bring about radical change.” Nouwen, The Wounded Healer, 20–21. They are inextricably linked together as conjoined realities.

Herein lies the integrated quality of the spirituality which every evangelical mystic is to live out. Henri Nouwen provides us a brilliant example of how to do this.

Footnotes

About the Author

Wil Hernandez, Ph.D., works for The Leadership Institute in Southern California in partnership with the Denver-based Spiritual Formation Alliance. He regularly teaches a course on the spirituality of Henri Nouwen at Fuller Theological Seminary. Wil is the author of Henri Nouwen: A Spirituality of Imperfection (Paulist Press, 2006). http://www.nouwenlegacy.com

Up next in collection